Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardus (computer game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pardus (computer game)

Non-notable web/browsergame. No evidence in the article of the topic having received significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources. Delete for failing WP:NOTE. Article was deleted once already for this reason. I searched Google and found nothing useful. Peephole (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Peephole (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There is one news source referenced...are there more we can find? A google search seems to suggest that the game is rather popular. I do think the size/extent of the page should be greatly reduced though. I doubt much of the material on it could be referenced in reliable sources. Cazort (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - see http://www.pardus.at/index.php?section=about_coverage for lots of sources. --Joshua Issac (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Joshua Issac, Nom confuses notability with importance, there's further a risk of systemic bias due to Austrian origin. Enough RS exist to support article. MLauba (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup — notability easily established above. However, the article can use some cleanup and wikification to make it more encyclopedic in nature and better sourced via mentioned reliable sources. MuZemike 17:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This game has an article at StrategyWiki:Pardus which contains a fair bit of gameplay info about the game. A lot of the gameplay section here should be either moved there, or reduced since it matches a lot of the other games in the genre and is not important. -- Prod (Talk) 20:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The article should also be renamed to Pardus (video game). SharkD (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Pardus (game) would be even better. --Joshua Issac (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - The naming convention established at WikiProject Video games generally prefer "(video game)" over plain "(game)" and certainly over "(computer game)". MuZemike 17:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.