Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parametric Landscapes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Parametric design. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parametric Landscapes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not clear there is a topic here at all. Seems to be trying to apply “parametric landscape” to a variety of fields. Yes, all of them can be described using parameters, but none of them is called a “parametric landscape”. Don’t know if anything can be salvaged for a new or existing article, but as-is this is pretty hopeless. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 09:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Parametric design. This article looks like a synthesis, per WP:SYNTH and I haven't found any secondary sources that ties all the concepts together; as the nom says, the article is ill-formed in its current state. However, there is the book Flux: Architecture in a Parametric Landscape and more generally the architectural movement of Parametric design that covers the parametrically designed landscapes and urban structures mentioned in the article. Hence I think this could be usefully redirected to Parametric design, where the topic is discussed more generally. --Mark viking (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Article is sub-literate. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.