Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradiso project (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation (WP:CSD#G12). PeterSymonds (talk) 16:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Paradiso project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is about a project that does not meet Notability. A search for Reliable sources about the project don't turn up any significant coverage. News results are for housing developments that happen to have the same name. Additionally the article appears to suffer from a conflict of interest. Most of the material reads like a press release, and in fact, I've removed a section that was a verbatim copy of a page from the project web site. The remaining text is still substantially a composite of press release material glued together. Whpq (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize that there was a previous AFD. It was speedied as a copyvio. -- Whpq (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Taken verbatim from here [1]. ShoesssS Talk 14:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as copyvio, for using nonsense phrase "hypothesis of the disruptive paradigm concerning global societal developments", for promotional language, and for non-notability. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as a copyvio of this Mayalld (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.