Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parabolic window

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as HOAX. RunningOnBrains^(talk) 03:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parabolic window

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded with: "unreferenced original research. No sources found". I will go further and suggest hoax. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete as a hoax article. I've read Beowolf I don't recall any mention of bodybuilding or protein absorption! HominidMachinae (talk) 08:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as per my original PROD rationale, per HominidMachinae, and per db-hoax. The images on the page have nothing to do with it. And 'after eating a cow' is an obvious joke. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This has been recreated again at Parabolic Window (already deleted CSD A10) --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. I spent some time searching on the off-chance that there was something genuine here written up in a silly way, but no. There are parabolic windows about, but they are to do with frequency estimation. No sign of Shaw and Blonne. I would have expected it to be Desperate Dan rather than Beowulf who built up his strength by eating cows in parabolic windows. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as feeble hoax. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.