Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper jam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was link to Wiktionary. It's a transwikied dicdef, but a plausible search term. (non-admin closure) Sceptre ^(talk) 18:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paper jam

Delete Not a dab, only 1 entry with a link. Page would only be useful as a Wiktionary page Boleyn (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC) on their talk page(s). Boleyn (talk)}}[reply]

Delete I'd point out that even before it was stripped of the silliness [1] (which is why only 1 entry is left), this article has undergone various incarnations-- spam for some company that thought it would be a good idea to remind people of an irritating experience, a definition for people who might not figure out what the phrase means, and a vehicle for jokes about the worst flavor of jam ever [2]. Worth glancing at to see why some articles don't belong at all. Mandsford (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DICT --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: was copied to Wiktionary over a year ago. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.