Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panfletonegro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No quorum, thus, a WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 01:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Panfletonegro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly unnotable website and blog. It has no references that would support any sort of notability. Searching around only gives results of personal pages (facebook, twitter, etc), thus it fails WP:RS. Rorshacma (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are a handful of articles that came up in Google News archive and some hits in Google books (mostly in a directory-type setting), but they aren't the type that would help it pass WP:WEB. This is just a website that is more noticed than the average website, but still isn't notable enough to warrant its own article at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.