Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painting methods and Brushwork

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:NOTHOWTO. Content can be restored on request for anybody who wants to transwiki it to any other project. Sandstein 20:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Painting methods and Brushwork

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undiluted how-to guide. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, an undiluted, unreferenced how-to guide. But it's quite a good one, and wikiHow doesn't seem to have anything about brushwork. Transwiki. (The creator may read this, and he seems to be new to Wikipedia, so I want to say "welcome!" and to explain that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. The content we want is encyclopaedia articles. The place for user-submitted how-to guides of the kind that you've written is wikiHow, so I've suggested that the closer -- which means the person who judges the outcome of this discussion -- should send it there.)—S Marshall T/C 00:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiHow is hopelessly un-moderated, allows duplicate articles and other editorial horrors. Terence Kearey's article would probaly find acceptance at Wikibooks. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support transwiki to Wikibooks and delete here. I agree that Wikibooks seems to be the best project for this article. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the top entry at User talk:Terence Kearey - the poor guy has been there already. Wikiversity or wikiHow? But delete here as pure how-to. Johnbod (talk) 21:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems too generic, vague, needs referencing; perhaps merge to a larger materials oriented article...Modernist (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to WikiBooks. Reyk _YO! 23:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.