Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P is for Panda
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unanimous consensus to delete, which started out as a PROD initially, with only comments made during AFD being about lack of reliable sources, namely, zero reliable sources found. -- Cirt (talk) 02:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum: Will consider restore and relist upon request. -- Cirt (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- P is for Panda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
contested prod. No reliable sources found to establish notability of a company. This blog post seems to be the closest to such. tedder (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. No Reliable Sources found, just self-referential sources, social media sites, etc. --MelanieN (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.