Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSP Solitude

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 05:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PSP Solitude

Game mod with no assertion of notability. Ironholds (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A7 - fails WP:WEB totally. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spammy page, non notable Lets drink Tea 20:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Tony Fox. Jenuk1985 | Talk 20:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MLauba (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: it isn't web-related, though, it is a mod for a specific console. I thought I'd bring it here to be on the safe side. Ironholds (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unreleased game, not notable, article seems to be by the developers; sorry, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and is not here to help promote it, you'll have to wait till after it has been released and become so popular that independent reliable sources start to write about it. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Leave the Article: The game described in the article is set to have a release at the end of this month. This mod already is very popular and many people are anticipating it. I am the originator of this article and I am in no way apart of the team that is developing it. I am merely a person that has been watching the project for a little while, long enough though to know what I am saying about it. Also it has been featured on the Quick Jump Network, which is cited in the article. Corytheidiot (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC) — Corytheidiot (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball, nor is it a development diary. The article will have its place here if and when it gets sufficiently noticed and commented upon in sufficient reliable third-party sources. MLauba (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
About Crystal Ball: This is a guaranteed thing. It is not pure speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corytheidiot (talk • contribs) 21:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Provide the required sources to back it up and the whole discussion becomes moot. Searched myself, came up empty. MLauba (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete – lack of verifiability via reliable secondary sources (once more, Mod DB is self-published material and hence is not reliable, nor are primary sources). It is also written in an unencyclopedic manner, failing WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:CRYSTAL. MuZemike 22:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no independent reliable sources. (the refs in the article link to WP articles. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment? The least he could do is put the website as an external source, even if it is a forum. Elm-39 - T/C 17:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources.--Sloane (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.