Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OutSpoken Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OutSpoken Productions

I can't find any reliable sources. Schuym1 (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete as serch only finds trivial mention... no notability per WP:N Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask you to hang on for a bit: there are mentions in newspapers like The Guardian, The Observer, The Daily Telegraph, Gay Times, Radio Times etc but I need to find online references to these sources. While this was a minor company it did play an extremely important role in the development of lesbian and gay broadcasting in this era. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapmark (talk • contribs) 12:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have the remainder of this AFD to add sources. Schuym1 (talk) 15:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, mentions don't show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note, sources don't have to be online. but if not, then quotes showing they are not trivial mentions would be useful.Yobmod (talk) 09:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:CORP and I can't find much about them either. No signs of notability. This US version[1] is not related, is it? ~~SIS~~ 23:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.