Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbital Replacement Unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 09:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orbital Replacement Unit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete − This was a creator disputed WP:PROD. The article is just a list; nothing more, nothing less. It reads like the ingredience of the side of a bottle of shampoo. As an example, here's one of the entries: Latching End Effector (LEE) weight 415 lbs. at ELC-1 FRAM-1 (top side) x 3 units on ISS. Wikipedia is not a random collection of information. The article should be deleted per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTRECIPE. — Fly by Night (talk) 01:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a spare parts list for the space station. At most the intro paragraph should be turned into a wiktionary entry. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 06:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Kilmer-san (talk) 06:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - and improve. Now big part looks like database dump Bulwersator (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.