Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orange technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Masses of refs but which ones establish the notability of this technology? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:26, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be another case of a professor (plus students) trying to promote a very narrow research area, maybe to get tenure? W Nowicki (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to be a notable concept, at least not yet. Google Scholar hits were all from that one professor and cited minimally. The article itself, and its references, kept crashing my internet connection so I can't really evaluate them, but searching does not support notability. --MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO - it is "newly emerged...." 18:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Clearly a promotion; does not seem notable to me. My very best wishes (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.