Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operational flight plan
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Operational flight plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Duplicative of flight plan (and flight planning). I initially redirected this to flight plan in November, but was reverted by the article's creator last month. This article is little more than a dictionary definition of the subject, and I see no evidence its continued existence is justified when it can easily be incorporated in either flight plan or flight planning. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Transportation. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Merge - Effectively the same thing, best to keep content from both pages LemonberryPie (talk) 00:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- These are two different things. In the official wiki system launched by EUROCONTROL these are two different articles: OFP and FPL.In the US, OFP may be called CFP.
- Examples:
Collapsed wall of text added by Leksey. Trainsandotherthings (talk)
|
---|
|
Leksey (talk) 03:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Backing up your argument with a wall of gibberish is not the route to take. Demonstrate with cited sources from which an article can be written, what the subject is. Where's a book that explains this, and where in the book is the explanation, for example? Uncle G (talk) 04:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've collapsed your giant wall of text. Please do NOT add any more examples. That phone number may need to be oversighted as well. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)