Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open to Export

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hibu. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Open to Export

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website; I would have done a speedy, but it's a little too complicated for that. No mentions in the press that I can find. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. 19:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. 19:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 08:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this is a Beta service with just announcements of what it plans to accomplish, it is a case of WP:TOOSOON; until then I suggest a redirect to Hibu (formery Yell). AllyD (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.