Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenDAM
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- OpenDAM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The software discussed is not available as anything but a service. Thus even if the article were updated, it would be little more than advertising. GregRundlett (talk) 01:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 06:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, as I'm not able to find anything to establish notablilty or to let it pass WP:WEBCRIT. — crh 23 (Talk) 09:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – Does not meet WP:N / WP:WEBCRIT, per source searches. North America1000 08:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak delete - if someone can find reliable, independent sources I will change my vote immediately. But it currently lacks notability. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as none of this actually suggest any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.