Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One page website

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sorry for the relist. I was fooled by size of the nominator's signature into thinking this was 2 AFDs. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One page website

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 13:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We need some reasons as to why this is being deleted. Granted, I can see quite a few reasons (original research, written more like an article for a personal website than a neutral encyclopedia entry, etc), but we need a reason.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Little beyond a definition of the term, simply stating the obvious: a one page website is a website with one page. any other content is essay-like.TheLongTone (talk) 14:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- "But one page website has a single web page." per WP:NOTDIRECTORYOFTAUTOLOGIES. Dru of Id (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless we get some third-party coverage of one-page websites as a distinctive form. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essay, unsourced, no RS, pure OR, er, why is that page there? Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think the title, "single serving site", or "single use site" is a more appropriate term. See the google results of this term as well. A single use site is a single page with a dedicated domain name and has only a single use or limited purposes. Also, this page gives some good examples of these one-page, single-use websites. - M0rphzone 22:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Original research of-course. The term isn't popular nor notable. →TSU ^tp* 17:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:OR. Why was this relisted? Pburka (talk) 03:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, completely unsourced essay, and one-page websites aren't really that special. JIP | Talk 06:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.