Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Written like a textbook, hopeless case for re-write, blow it up start again. Article is too specific and technical to be useful, written about a specific experiment, could possibly be reduced and merged into the Entanglement article. Despayre tête-à-tête 14:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As nominator. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 17:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge some content to Entanglement-assisted classical capacity which seems the most relevant article. Appears too specific for a stand-alone article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Promotion of a paper with only 7 cites on GS. Too early. When it has 700 cites we can take another look. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete Too narrow a topic for an encyclopedia entry, no inline citations, few sources, and waaaaaaaay too long. Famousdog 08:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.