Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Octix by Aeternitas827, with redirect left behind deleted by JamesBWatson, so this AfD is now moot. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 13:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Octix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Google search brings up mostly download pages and press releases. Prod tag removed by IP without comment. ... discospinster _talk 01:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Best I could is this which does not seem to be a reliable source. Derild 49 21 ☼ 01:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Keep - I'm not done writing this article. Is there a way to make this private so I can edit it before my ambition gets blown to pieces? Leodorain (talk) 06:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the games own creators are not a good enough source for information, then what is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aetern142 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Incubator; article isn't 24h old yet, and a cursory search indicates the article may be able to pass given work, and the author has given indication of doing so; I say give it a chance before it's cut.Aeternitas827 (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of moving it to the incubator, however I won't be able to do this. According to wikipedia, in order for me to move an article I would need to have my account for four days Moving an Article. I just recently made this account. The only option I can think of now is to drag everything I've got and put it aside. I'm afraid of what will happen to my current article. Seems like it'll be deleted, but I'm wondering, can I re-post the article? Is that against the so-called "rules"?
Thanks for your support Aetern. I really appreciate it! :) Leodorain (talk) 08:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can help with that, given the circumstances; is there any objection for going this route (at least for the time being?)Aeternitas827 (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"is there any objection..." I don't see any reason why I shouldn't do this so there are no objections. Leodorain (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Re-reading, I'm going to say that consensus isn't a need on this sort of move, as it is a viable alternative to deletion. I'll undertake the move momentarily.Aeternitas827 (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Complete, now located here. Nearing my end of night, however, when I have a chance I'll take a peek and see if I can help out with improvement. Aeternitas827 (talk) 09:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.