Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obihai Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. No discussion of individual sources, but consensus after two relists is clear to keep. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹ 19:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obihai Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was tagged for speedy deletion per WP:ADV and WP:CORP. It doesn't belong there (as CSD is for uncontroversial deletions), but I'm nominating it here to open discussion on whether the topic itself meets our notability guidelines. K7L (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, under what criteria is this article being proposed for deletion? I don't see it fitting any criteria.--NotWillyWonka (talk) 01:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, good deal source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - does not appear to have any reason meeting deletion criteria.--NotWillyWonka (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.