Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OS2World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article was deleted at 10:45, 22 November 2013 by Deb (talk · contribs), who did not close this discussion. v/r (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OS2World

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note that the photo shows only 2 members online.... This does not seem notable to me. Tritario (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete: non-notable. a quick google search only shows the sited, a couple small blogs, and social media. Aunva7
Where is the article that was wrote? OS2World leaded the petition to open source IBM that is mentioned in OS/2 articles and also took part of the OOXML voting on Sweeden. It is a relevant site, I disagree with your arguments Martiniturbide (talk) 22:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 18:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Can you please point me to the link of the "archive of the debate"? Martiniturbide (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:50, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Martiniturbide (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC) Wikipediands to do discuss, they just delete content and knowledge. There is not use to help improving wikipedia, I prefer joining efforts with the Internet Archive.[reply]