Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OKI Common Lisp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Common Lisp. czar 05:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OKI Common Lisp

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without improvement. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 00:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete as it's a de-PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Common Lisp - significant coverage in reliable, independent sources does not appear to exist, and as such I very much doubt that this implementation is independently notable. firefly ( t · c ) 06:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, and incorporate content into Common Lisp. While I can't find any real sources talking about significant uses of this implementation, it certainly existed, and we have at least enough sourcing to verify this fact. It's not enough for a standalone article, but the content should be kept somewhere. jp×g 01:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.