Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ODers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects can be added at editorial discretion. I see the merge suggestion but the total lack of sourcing speaks against it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ODers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Complete lack of reliable sources and a failure to demonstrate notability. Content is minimal; I don't think this warrants either a merge or a redirect to Cybersex, so I'm putting it forward for outright deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —C.Fred (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 02:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.