Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NursingNotes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NursingNotes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable periodical. No independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
All information on the site is verifiable. MattBodell (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I have searched and cannot find coverage. @MattBodell: the issue is not verifiability but notability, as shown by coverage of NursingNotes in other reliable sources. Please also have a look at the conflict of interest guidance. Tacyarg (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.