Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number One Enemy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Daisy Dares You. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 03:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number One Enemy

COMMENT - The single: "Number One Enemy" has been released as of 1 March 2010, and has since charted at #13 in the UK Singles Chart. As such, I believe that the article should be created, which I wouldn't mind creating. Thanks, Sam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sllewellyn7 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

REDIRECT - I actually believe this should be a redirect to Daisy Dares You but, having made that alteration twice, explaining the relevant policy on the talk page and being reverted without comment, I'm going this route. This is an unreleased album coming out later this month by an artist who "is yet to release an album or single". According to WP:NSONG: "... generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label ... an unreleased album may qualify for an advance article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it ... this only applies to a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects." I think there's a determined attempt to advertise this unreleased song by an unreleased artist, which is why I'm taking this extraordinary step rather than simply waiting a few weeks. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT - I note further that the article was created as a redirect and thereafter remade in the first of three conversions to an article, not two as I said above. And one further quote from WP:NSONG: "Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources. Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release." The emphasis is not mine but that of the policy. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE & REDIRECT - This article lacks references. I don't think it's currently notable as one article. Maybe a mention on Daisy Dares You is sufficient. -- Kei_Jo (Talk to me baby! :þ) 22:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge, can always be redone if it becomes notable Alan - talk 00:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge, not currently notable per WP:N in its own right. Truthanado (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.