Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear program of North Korea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to North Korea and weapons of mass destruction. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear program of North Korea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:TWODABS situation, which could just as easily be resolved with a redirect to one page and a hatnote pointing to the other. I would expect, in this age of nuclear saber-rattling, that the appropriate redirect target would be North Korea and weapons of mass destruction, and indeed a Google search for "North Korea" AND "nuclear program" -wikipedia returns almost entirely results on the weapons-related aspect. bd2412 T 01:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the North Korea and WMDs article, add a hatnote to the other article. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 03:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and hatnote per nom and benlisquare. I note also that North Korea's nuclear program is already a redirect to the WMDs article. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect straightforward and uncontroversial --Lockley (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.