Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noventi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The spam has been removed, and sources have been added. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noventi

Procedural nom: after I deleted the article, an employee contested the proposed deletion. The reason for deletion was "no sources to indicate this firm meets the notability requirements of WP:CORP". Maxim_(talk) 23:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Keep. I added some references.--Eastmain (talk) 00:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notable or not, the current article is spammy and contains promotional prose of the sort that would require a complete rewrite: The Noventi team brings a strong combination of venture investing and operational experience. Utilizing an entrepreneurial approach to venture investing, the team favors innovation, a team approach and capital efficiency as key elements of portfolio company success. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - enough sources to establish notability. The spamminess is an editting concern, and is in fact a copyvio of a press release. I've removed the offending material. -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. The article is weak in asserting notability, but there do appear to be third-party references to the company, and the spam is gone now. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.