Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonlinear optics Quantum computer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nonlinear optics Quantum computer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is written as if the quantum computer based on non-linear optics exists. In fact, there are one or two theoretical proposals, and one group working towards an experimental realization of a quantum gate (from where, even if successfully demonstrated, will still be years or decades until coupling of qubits have been realized, and decades until something we could call "a quantum computer". WP:TOOSOON. Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, with Linear optical quantum computing for now. SailingInABathTub (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sourced to ScienceDaily, phys.org, and ResearchGate, so it's non-encyclopedic material that doesn't deserve to be merged anywhere. I'd suggest a redirect, but the title is too awkward a term to be a good search query. XOR'easter (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ymblanter. One of a dozen speculative ways to make a quantum computer. This is basically just at the conceptual stage. Statements in the article: "It is more energy efficient and much less susceptible to noise. It will result in better GPU,TPU/IPU or FPGA." are just WP:CRYSTAL. 〈 Forbes₇₂ | Talk 〉 21:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.