Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble Racing
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noble Racing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable video game. Close but not enough - there isn't enough reliable secondary sourcing provided to substantiate the details about the game. The Digitally Downloaded review is a great start, but the OPS2 'review' is a sentence pointing to another unavailable issue, so at best is WP:OFFLINE and in itself isn't helping a lot. And that's unfortunately it: the other sources are WP:PRIMARY or WP:USERG. No hits on Metacritic or Mobygames; no coverage on items in the Internet Archive. VRXCES (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. VRXCES (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Can't say I can see any sources, and the WP:BURDEN is on the article creator to provide them in these cases. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of PlayStation 2 games (L–Z) as an alternative to deletion. If the OPS2 review is someday found, the article can be easily restored. --Mika1h (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect- to List of PlayStation 2 games (L–Z) is an ok ATD for me too, additional searching did not help add standalone notability for the video game so far.Lorraine Crane (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- As a licensed game of Noble Automotive, I would suggest a merge/redirect there. IgelRM (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2025 (UTC)