Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitesh Estates Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nitesh Estates Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about subject that seems to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - the company is notable all over the world. Even its MD's page is also existing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitesh_Shetty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kratipaw34 (talk • contribs) 07:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC) — Kratipaw34 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete -Yes, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH. We may however make a redirect to the Nitesh Shetty article. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it follows WP:CORPDEPTH. All content are verifiable. Ramesh 12:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramesh985 (talk • contribs) — Ramesh985 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - Nitesh Estates Limited is a notable company. The sources used over here are of the media sites Economic Times, Deccan Herald, Money Control etc. that in itself states that its notable 46.229.224.226 (talk · contribs) 12:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC) — jolly.smith (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- @Jolly.smith: - it looks like you forgot to log in to post the above -- please log in in order to change the signature back to your username (just an identity protection measure). --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - This smells of a sockpuppetry case, Rhododendrites. Ethically^Yours! 06:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for (1) lack of notability (WP:CORPDEPTH isn't met, only the "New King" ref approaches what is requried), (2) for being promotional per WP:TNT, and (3) for copyright violations for text taken from [1]. --j⚛e decker ^talk 00:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally promotional, sources do not support notability at all. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:33, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.