Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintoaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | converse _ 17:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nintoaster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (declined PROD). Appears to be a minor internet meme of sorts, with some novelty coverage in things like Kotaku. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's so poorly written I couldn't even confirm what it was about from the article itself, but a Google search confirms it's a non-notable internet joke/meme. Stuff like this can be safely deleted under A7 as web content with no significance shown. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I thought that, since it's a thing that exists in the real world, calling it web content was a bit of a stretch. Close enough, though, I suppose. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it made toast that might be notable, but it's just another game console hardware mod (people put video game consoles inside all kinds of boxes[1]). --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per Colapeninsula. People, for whatever reasons, put video game consoles into all sorts of different things. Not a noteworthy feat really, especially since this isn't even a sort of hybrid, it just has a toaster case to it. I don't see any third party coverage that makes this meet the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 18:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - For a plethora of reasons.JoelWhy (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly' a weak Redirect to the Angry Video Game Nerd, but otherwise Delete due to lack of any apparent notability. --MASEM (t) 23:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks reliable sources, not notable RadioFan (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Or Weak Merge to Angry Video Game Nerd if independent reliable sources are found. Salvidrim! 19:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete failing WP:N. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Nintendo Entertainment System#Legacy or somewhere. I was going to say "delete", but a quick search actually turns up reliable video game sources: Kotaku, IGN plus Super Nintoaster *facepalm* IGN, Kotaku, Joystiq. So, yeah... this does pass WP:GNG as far as I can see with multiple, reliable, independent sources doing non-trivial coverage of this NES mod. That said, the amount of information (and little critical reception) is suited for a parent article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.