Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nils kuiper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nils kuiper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A model whose photos are posted around on social media but with no actual coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NMODEL. Largoplazo (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The author added mentions of a couple of prizes Nils Kuiper has won. One of them was a local inter-school art contest when he was 14, for a painting titled "Summertime". I haven't looked into the significance of the "Mr. Alternative" award. Largoplazo (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that the article does not demonstrate significant coverage from reliable sources. I also note that, even if everything in the article were to be reliably sourced (some of it is based on YouTube videos), there would still be a question of whether the article was making a reasonable claim of significance. NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination – Editør (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.