Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Ebert
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG or WP:NHOCKEY j⚛e deckertalk 14:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nick Ebert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another recently drafted player that fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. First All-Rookie Team is not the same (and thus does not qualify for notability) as First All-Star Team, Contested PROD, removed without comment. Ravendrop 04:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails on notability grounds. Reading the article he'd probably be happy not to have the word 'plummeted' on his permanent record. Agathoclea (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he meets nhockey or otherwise achieves notability. -DJSasso (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails NHOCKEY, can be re-created if he ever does. Patken4 (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:NHOCKEY. It can be re-created once the person becomes notable but not for now. →TSU tp* 10:55, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.