Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Game Network
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- New Game Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet WP:WEB, specifically falling foul of WP:SIGCOV. It appears that there have been efforts to mask the lack of notability through incidental mentions of the website (WP:PLUG may thus also apply). I have made searches to find significant third-party coverage of this site's activities and found nothing. Domeditrix (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Domeditrix (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Domeditrix (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Domeditrix (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, i've just reviewed your latest article Easy Allies which is also about a video games review site; do you have any conflict of interest regarding this subject or writing about it? thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- I have no conflict of interest in this matter, and I'm not sure why an AfD page for a separate page would be the appropriate place to ask this question. I came across the New Game Network Wikipedia page when looking through reviewed pages for video games websites, as a means of better drafting the article on Easy Allies. Domeditrix (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 14:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 14:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - This does not look to have any secondary sources from gaming websites and all it looks to be advertising the website. GamerPro64 16:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I tagged the article for notability years back, and I’m not seeing that this was ever addressed. Nothing in its poorly conceived “Notability” section is anywhere close to translating to a valid “keep” stance here. Sergecross73 msg me 16:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.