Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurotronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Editors can figure out a redirect target later if they want to. Sandstein 06:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neurotronics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a synthesis from primary sources. Guy (Help!) 19:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Neuromorphic engineering. I can't find any mention of the term "neurotronics" apart from a dozen companies who presumably think that this is a way cool name, dude. Article appears to be an original synthesis including coinage of umbrella term.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Sounds like a WP:HOAX article. SW3 5DL (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:CHEAP and WP:FORK. Bearian (talk) 16:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know if this is a hoax, but it sure looks like original research and/or synthesis. As for redirecting, here's a short list of where the term is already being used on Wikipedia -- Search Results. One of those pages is linking to the instant article, but apparently thinks it's an article on a particular company. Other pages have little or nothing to do with neural engineering. I don't see redirecting as a viable option here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I must have been thinking round a corner there - the content would be suited for redirection, but the title would make for a confusing redirect name (if we consider it a coinage). So, delete.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to OpenXDF#History, where the Neurotronics, the company, is mentioned as the developer of the OpenXDF data standard. I agree that this article is OR and that neurotronics as a search term for neuromorphic engineering is not compelling. But the company is a real entity and is somewhat notable for initially developing the openXDF standard. I don't know if the company itself is standalone notable, but it's role is verifiable and makes it a plausible search term for a redirect. --Mark viking (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or Merge with Neural engineering or something related to it. also, agree to Elmidae. ProDuct0339^say_work^proj 08:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Merge: not a hoax topic, but we don't need a different article for each neologism that's coined whenever somebody reinvents that wheel. Should redirect to a relevant scientific topic, not the company. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 13:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is to delete or redirect, but three different targets have been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.