Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neural gas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Shimeru 03:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neural gas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- This page was prodded "WP:N WP:V, orphan, WP:COI", but perhaps better get it discussed properly. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. 842 Gbook hits on "neural gas network" [1], 1800 Gscholar hits on "neural gas network" [2]. The likelihood of false positives on this term is low. Novickas (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is a machine learning technique which is still current - not the most common method in existence but still. We just need to find some references showing applications, or suchlike. --mcld (talk) 12:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: according to sources meets WP:N. Dewritech (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems pretty well referenced now (since beign AFD). I'd say that is a good outcome of the process :) --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 19:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.