Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Networking information technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Jake Wartenberg 04:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Networking information technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a repost of a college assignment: personal essay per WP:NOR and WP:SYNTHESIS, general description of several internet technologies already covered in other articles. MuffledThud (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's a poor school essay. Fences&Windows 23:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Information and communication technologies. --Lambiam 16:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just an essay.--fetchcomms 23:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, possible Redirect to Information and communication technologies if someone smart thinks "Networking information technology" is a valid encyclopedic term. With quotes google has 29,700 results for "Networking information technology". So it seems to not be a useful phrase PirateArgh!!1! 00:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No useful information. Materialscientist (talk) 00:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.