Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netrendity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Netrendity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any independent reliable sources that support the existence of this organization. Thus, the article should be deleted per our general notability guidelines and our notability guidelines for corporations. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 19:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proof of this establishment can be found in this legal document [1] Iphageenia^{User talk:Iphageenia} 20:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but that doesn't support anything else besides the fact that the business actually exists. Thus, an article about such a business would not be able to be verified properly, as there is nothing that can be verified (at least with online reliable sources) besides its existence. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 20:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to review this page, which such operation it coordinates and shows the company's involvement on the content. Page has been up for several months and is expanding soon. Iphageenia^{User talk:Iphageenia} 20:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages and is not a platform intended for cheap marketing or promotion. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find reliable sources either. The aboe objection didn't resolve the fundamental problem (notability) one is document narrowly showing existence and WP:E≠N, the other is reference to (likely) more notable brand which they are related but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED on Wikipedia. Fails WP:CORP for lack of independent coverage. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.