Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netgear SC101
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Netgear SC101 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable product that is sourced almost entirely from the manufacturers websites. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It may have been "sourced almost entirely from the manufacturers websites" but after following wp:before it should not have been. Sources now added to satisfy WP:GNG. --Pontificalibus (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs cleanup, but it clearly meets the GNG. Steven Walling • talk 22:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per availability of reliable sources and those added to the article. It appears that the nominator may not have followed the guidelines listed in WP:BEFORE for source searching prior to nominating this article for deletion, which, if true, nullifies the basis of nomination for deletion. There's no mention in the nomination regarding the availability of reliable sources. The nomination's basis is upon content within the article, rather than upon searching for reliable sources, as required per WP:BEFORE requirements. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.