Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nespak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nespak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established as per wikipedia guidelines, author requested to provide secondary source reference to establish notability, primary reference is not enough Uzairsyedahmed (talk) 12:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Major English newspapers in Pakistan such as DAWN, Daily Times and PakTribune have published dozens of articles about NESPAK going back decades. The solution is to improve the article by regular editing, rather than to delete an article about a notable organization. Cullen328 (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nominator appears to be single purpose account connected to deleted article Zishan Engineers. Nominator, please disclose any possible conflict of interest.Cullen328 (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Cullen328. Notable organisation. Mar4d (talk) 06:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.