Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ncompass Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. While participation was limited quantitatively in the discussion, I think that the nominator presented a sound reasoning, per policy, for deleting the article. I also note that the debate was listed to two WikiProjects, and no editor from either project came forward with a rationale to keep or to in any way dispute the nomination. Accordingly, in my judgment, the discussion here represents a valid consensus on the lack of merit for an article on the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ncompass Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
a non-notable label. speedy was declined because the article "claims to be the first to offer digital download of an album", however, those 'claims' haven't been backed by reliable sources. I searched for sources on-line but nothing substantial came up. Delete. Dragquennom (talk) 12:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; no evidence of notability. Usual caveats apply, however; if they come up with a notable release, we might have to revisit. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 02:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing administrator's comment. The relisting editor was consulted and consented to my decision to close the debate. —C.Fred (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.