Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazo unleashed trilogy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Jayron32 19:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nazo unleashed trilogy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fan ~~game~~ flash video. No reliable sources show third party coverage to establish notability. (PROD removed without explanation.) Sergecross73 msg me 21:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I believe the IP above is saying that they are the one who removed the PROD without reasoning. They also removed the AFD notification. Please, do no remove the AFD notification until this discussion ends. Even then, usually an Admin will remove it. Sergecross73 msg me 23:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I mean I removed the game selection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Sergecross73 msg me 23:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The fan game selection,isn't that the reason I'm here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, there has been some confusion. The IP is talking about this edit, which he later reverted himself. It made me think that this whole article was about a a fan game. It appears it's just a flash video, with this IP claiming he would make a fan video game about the fan video. (Not sure if that's a testament to the articles poor quality, or if I just didn't read close enough because one doesn't have to read it super closely to see it should be deleted by wikipedia standards.)

To the IP (I think you refer to yourself as "Tailsman" sometimes?) - I'm glad you removed your self created rumors about a fan game of a fan video, as that is both non-notable, and probably a conflict of interest even if it were notable. However, this discussion is to delete the article as a whole, not just the little section your wrote. Sergecross73 msg me 01:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced, and no sign of notability. Elton Bunny (talk) 12:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me there are alot of notability.~Tailsman67 of the Sonic News Network~

Comments like that are empty unless you can prove it. Can you provide some sources from wikipedia-standard, reliable, third party sources? Sergecross73 msg me 14:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An example of a fan with great ideas to use in a video game. Unfortunately, no fans took it to the next level so the media and Sega can acknowledge it. « ₣M₣ » 02:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Ironically, if Sega/the media ever did catch on, chances are there'd be legal action and/or the video would be taken down, since not only does the game use characters they don't have the rights to, it also uses voice clips ripped right out of official videos/games. Just throwing that out there pre-emptively, in case anyone throws out the inevitable "I bet there are sources out there somewhere" argument... Sergecross73 msg me 20:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Na,Sega might leave them alone,the dude is a fan.~Tailsman67~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm finding no reliable sources on this series, and so can't determine what notability (if any) exists. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.