Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NaviSite Inc.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to NaviSite. Merge new content into existing article on NaviSite and redirect (non-admin closure) (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 09:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are millions of web hosting companies, and this one still makes no assertion of notability.
Delete non-notable Redirect per Whpq below pablohablo. 13:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Notability doesn't appear to be established here. With 17 DCs, it almost sounds like they might be large enough to be notable, but this article doesn't have me particularly convinced. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 15:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 15:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep With 17 DCs i would agree that they should be large enough to be notable. Frozenevolution (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless more info appears by magic to indicate notability. Established 1997, 17 DCs - is that it? Peridon (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As some notability-indicating sources magically appeared. More can probably be had, but it's hard sifting through all the press releases. Now does anybody want to tackle the prose? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 07:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Number 210 of North America's top technology integrators? That's notable? Peridon (talk) 12:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just looked back at that one - the source at RedOrbit is given as NaviSite Inc. Scrub that one as independent. Anyone care to check some more? Peridon (talk) 12:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- sifting through a huge number of press releases, there are a few reliable sources writing about the company. This article, and this article from Information Week, as well as articles from Forbes and The Street. -- Whpq (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to NaviSite given that there is already an existing referenced article -- Whpq (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is duplicate content. Another more accurate article for NaviSite, Inc. is already published on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaviSite Dderose.navisite (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.