Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navcane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navcane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the WP:GNG with very thin sourcing. The magazine article is actually written by the CEO (according to the Behance page) who also created this article. Raymie (t • c) 05:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, rather blatant advertisement. No indication of notability. Huon (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.