Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Bypass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Bypass

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article appears to be based on misunderstanding of first reference (http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/11/e340.full), a patient education page. This is not a medical term. [UseTheCommandLine ~/talk] #_ 01:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Does not appear notable and appears to be a misunderstanding. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with both rationales listed above. DVMt (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The term does not seem to be in general use, and the article is based on a few non-Reliable Sources. --MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The term is indeed used in a few sources, but it is a very informal term, which doesn't even seem to have a uniform meaning. Since this is a medicine-related article, sourcing and accuracy are paramount, and this article isn't up to that MEDRS level. --Noleander (talk) 05:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.