Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasr Javed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nasr Javed

WP:BLP1E. Coverage of this person is limited to one recent event. Policy is clear: Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them. Atmoz (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The 'bad boy list' isn't a random selection of people, it's a list of extremely notable individuals. Expand the article to improve coverage of the individual. Andrewjlockley (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no obvious assertion of lasting notability. Oren0 (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge My inclination would be to merge into an article about the people banned. But there seems to be some notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand Individual has responded to being placed on the list, and secondary sources exist. Failing that, would be somewhat in favor of merging as per above. Also, compare this discussion to that about a similar AfD about another individual on the list. Nanowolf (talk) 06:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. This person is a senior operative of a rather large terrorist organization who appears to be notable for additional reasons to Britain banning him from the country (he's been mentioned in The Hindu a few times for his quote about jihad). TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 19:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.