Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narthaki.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anita Ratnam. Tone 17:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narthaki.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The references in the article are passing mentions or footnotes in books. A Google search did not yield anything else. M4DU7 (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (Creator) Qualifies per wp:GNG, it is India's first and largest, and award winning portal dedicated to Indian classical dance. (See inline citations in the article). It being in footnotes means that it is cited as a reliable source. The article has been expanded after it was nominated at afd. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - at first glance, this might seem like it has significant coverage but most of the mentions are passing ones at best Spiderone 09:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The dance portal is maintained by one of India's most noted classical dancers. Its notability can be ascertained in this news article - . I think this article should be retained in Wikipedia--Vrsrini (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Anita Ratnam: The site is mentioned in a number of articles, but was barely discussed. It's best to discuss it in the target article. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. I would not oppose a selective merge. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.