Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NanoLab Nijmegen
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 09:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- NanoLab Nijmegen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This organization does not appear to meet WP:N. Reyk YO! 10:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 02:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's hard scanning sources quickly as most of the hits come back in Dutch, but the article on nl.wiki appears to be identical to this one with even less sources and the creator seems to be the director and thus has a WP:COI. On the other hand, there are at least brief acknowledgments in gscholar, and gnews does appear to provide what claims to be national news about the center itself, I just have no idea if the sources are actually reliable papers or not. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wine Guy~Talk 02:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. —Wine Guy~Talk 02:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.