Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Davis Quadratic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 18:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Davis Quadratic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to insufficient business coverage from reliable source.If there is any reliable source please feed me with them Mokorow1122 (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women. Shellwood (talk) 12:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article for sure needs improvement but Davis does have significant coverage in reliable sources eg Business Insider and Institutional Investor Mujinga (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as a sidenote article should be renamed to Nancy Davis (businesswoman) or similar. Mujinga (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unsure why the article adds the name her company after her proper name, has this been deleted before? We often see that when a deleted article has been re-created. Oaktree b (talk) 15:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nancy Davis was a Hollywood actor, later and better known as Nancy Reagan. I suspect the creator of this page simply didn't know how to disambiguate it properly. pburka (talk) 18:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  I thought "Quadratic" seemed like a strange surname. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nancy Davis Quadratic appears to have multiple notable media coverage with significant coverage. Please check this https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/08/19/the-fixed-income-markets-are-saying-inflation-is-going-to-be-contained-says-quadratic-capitals-nancy-davis.html,https://www.cfany.org/speaker-organizer/nancy-davis/,https://www.barrons.com/articles/barrons-100-most-influential-women-in-finance-nancy-davis-51583186897,https://www.forbes.com/sites/baldwin/2019/09/24/the-fear-fund-nancy-davis-etf-aims-to-protect-investors-from-scary-stuff-like-recession-and-inflation/, https://www.businessinsider.com/stocks-fed-inflation-investing-interest-rates-deflation-strategy-nancy-davis-2022-3,https://www.abc.net.au/news/programs/the-business/2022-03-17/nancy-davis-from-quadratic-capital-talks-to-the/13800890 are independent reliable source. She actually pass GNG.Mr Alebiii (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is notable but it require adjustment of the name. Nancy Davis Quadratic appears to have much independent sources such as [1],[2],[3], [4] and [5] from Google. I suggest this article to be Nancy Davis (Economist) rather than Nancy Davis Quadratic Ashavawani (talk) 12:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The Barrons (Maxey, Daisy (2020-03-13). "Nancy Davis". www.barrons.com. Retrieved 2022-09-28.) and Business Insider (Jay, Marley (2022-03-08). "An inflation expert and ex-Goldman Sachs trader breaks down why many investors' portfolios are still vulnerable to price shocks as oil hits 13-year highs — and shares the strategy she's using". Business Insider. Retrieved 2022-09-28.) refs appear to be enough to pass WP:BIO. --Hipal (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note Is this a dispute between rival UPEs? --Hipal (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.