Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NameBase (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion is not present in the nomination. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Namebase

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Namebase.org no longer exists. Shouldn't this therefore be deleted? FinerElements (talk) 08:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability is not temporary, meaning that Wikipedia can still have an article about subjects that have long since folded, wound up, or otherwise stopped existing. On the subject's merits, the page was kept in this deletion discussion about eight years back. In addition to those findings, there are plenty of paragraph-or-two-sized mentions of NameBase in books and journals, like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. They're not all stellar sources but together they do suggest notability, alongside existing sources and those found in the previous AfD. There might also be coverage in this Wired article, although it's weirdly cut off so I can't be sure. /wiae /tlk 15:07, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article currently seems convincing them enough. SwisterTwister talk 17:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.