Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N Programming Language
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- N Programming Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
crytalballing on a programming language no one has written about, and is still in development. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This article was just created, so I have no recommendation yet. Note that there already exists an N programming language as described in: Vaubois, Gael de La Croix, Catherine Moulinoux, and Benolt Derot. "The N Programming Language." Neurocomputing, NATO ASI series 68: 89-92. This article is not about that language. I could find no references to the language described in the About section of the article. Without any references to the language description, implementation, or any indication of its use, nothing is verifiable in the article, much less notable. If no reliable references are forthcoming, deletion is the best option. Mark viking (talk) 01:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete until it becomes more significant per WP:CRYSTALBALL AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Mediran talk to me! 08:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this article very clearly fails the general notability guideline. It has no 3rd party coverage in reliable sources. It seems to be a clear-cut misuse of wikipedia for promoting a new (as yet uncreated!) product. The contents of the article are so poor that it seems likely to have been created under a misaprehension. Note that anyone with the requisite skills can create a programming language. JoshuSasori (talk) 12:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.